The Bad Credit Mortgage Bailout: How Does It Work?
They got themselves into this mess and I don’t want my tax dollars used to get them out of it.
That’s the attitude of many when it comes to bailing out subprime borrowers from bad loans.
Still, many programs to help those facing foreclosure are being launched, with the aim of moving borrowers out of high-interest, variable-rate home mortgage loans and into lower-rate, fixed ones.
The Maryland housing market launched one of the first such plans, called Lifeline, a year ago. It goes like this:
Say you’re a homeowner with a 2/28 hybrid ARM due to reset next month from the initial two-year 5.25 percent “teaser rate” to 8.25 percent. It will reset again every six months up to as much as 12 percent.
The difference in monthly payments between the initial rate on your $200,000 mortgage and the first reset is nearly $400 ($1,502 versus $1,104). That’s bad enough but after another year or two, your adjustable-rate mortgage payment could come to $2,057. You can’t afford that.
You can go to one of the approved lenders on the website of Maryland’s Department of Housing and Community Development and ask to refinance home loans into a fixed rate package with a permanent low rate. Your payments will not only be lower than the reset rates, they will stay the same the entire length of the loan.
Without Lifeline, many borrowers would not have been able to secure a new loan, at least not with attractive terms. In many cases their credit scores would not qualify them for the rates the state-backed program offers.
In addition, their old lenders may have insisted on enforcing the onerous terms of their original agreements, such as prepayment penalties. The state has more leverage with lenders to compel them to co-operate with the program.
After the approved private lender puts together the new loan, it bundles it with others and sells them to the agency, which uses cash from a bond issue to buy the bundled loans.
The goal is that state coffers would not be used - the state hopes to pay off those bonds with the interest it collects from borrowers. But if too many borrowers default on their loans, it could be hard for the state to break even on the program.
Even if there aren’t a lot of defaults, raising money to fund the program isn’t free because it diverts resources from other projects, such as construction of bridges or highways. “There’s always an opportunity cost for the taxpayer,” said Joseph Gyourko, an economics professor with the Samuel Zell and Robert H. Lurie Real Estate Center at The Wharton School.
Not every Maryland mortgage borrower is eligible for the program. You can’t have household income of more than $126,420 and you can’t borrow more than $525,000. These limits vary from county to county, with high-cost areas near Washington, D.C. having the highest maximums.
The loans have interest rates of 6.25 percent for a 40-year fixed and 6.5 percent for a 30-year. There are also interest-only loans available that carry a rate of 6.5 percent. Borrowers pay 2 points at closing for any of these products, which may be folded into the loan.
Maryland also requires that the home be a primary residence and that the loan not exceed 85 percent of the value of the property.
So far, just a handful of borrowers have signed up for the program, fewer than 10 but many more are expected as numerous hybrid ARMs taken out in 2005 and 2006 start to hit their first resets.
To avoid future crises, Maryland is also trying to discourage irresponsible or unscrupulous lending, according to Thomas Perez, secretary for the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.
“I want to track loan originators who have disproportionate numbers of loans that go into foreclosure,” said Perez. Too many dings on the record of a mortgage broker, for example, could bring suspension or revocation of the broker’s license.
Ohio, which is suffering from a great many job layoffs as manufacturing plants shut down, has a similar program it calls Opportunity Loan.
Mark Wiseman, who runs a foreclosure prevention program for Cuyahoga County (which includes Cleveland), said the state had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation by the end of 2006. There are 1,200 foreclosures a month in his area and forecasts are for 75,000 statewide this year.
On April 2, Ohio announced it would sell $100 million worth of bonds, which could go to $500 million eventually, to fund Opportunity Loan. Rita Parisi, of the Ohio Housing Finance Agency, emphasizes that no taxpayer money is involved in the bailout. “We’re selling taxable bonds to make new mortgage loans to homeowners,” she says.
As in Maryland’s Lifeline program, the bonds are paid off using interest paid by the borrowers.
Parisi says her agency works with Fannie Mae to obtain underwriting waivers, approvals for homeowners who are unable to refinance under traditional products, but who qualify for the Opportunity Loans.
Other states, including Rhode Island, Massachusetts and the Virginia housing market, have started or are planning similar programs, according to the National Council of State Housing Agencies. More states are mulling over these and other options, such as interest rate buy down plans and rescue funds.
Nationally, relief for troubled subprime borrowers is coming from Freddie Mac. It has earmarked $20 billion to buy refinanced loans targeting holders of exotic home mortgages.
But it will not bailout every borrower. Borrowers must meet tightened credit standards and must be judged to be able to afford the new loan at its highest reset rate. Freddie Mac will limit use of low documented loans, so-called “liar loans,” in which borrowers do not have to prove assets or income.
Lenders also must take into account (as they also must do in the state bailout programs) property taxes and insurance in judging the qualifications of an applicant and the agency recommends that taxes be collected in an escrow account.
SOURCE: CNN Money


April 30th, 2007 at 10:42 am
thanks for the lifeline bail out. unfortunately,by pegging household incomes to 126000, some of us who have taken on two or three jobs extra to be able to keep on paying the high adjusted rates are excluded from the lifeline program.if we decided to quit those extra jobs or refuse to work extra hours, we will then automatically qualify .please we need help urgently.
November 14th, 2007 at 9:27 am
This is absolutely ridiculous! Did these people sign a legally-binding contract or did they not? I have very little financial training but I could tell right off that the ARMs are a losing proposition. If that is the only way you could get into a house, that means you should maybe not be buying a house at that time. All these programs cost us, the taxpayers, even if no tax money is DIRECTLY applied to the bail-out. To sign a contract, one must be over the age of 18, ostensibly an adult. It’s time to start acting like it and accepting the consequence of poor decisions. No bailout, no help. When I have financial trouble, I have to make do. Who’s there to bail me out? No one, and that’s the way it should be.
December 1st, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Matthew. Some of us were mislead into this. For example the mortgage I signed I was not told that it was adjustable at the signing. I specifically requested from my lender a fixed rate mortgage, this is what I was told I had until about 6 months ago when my rate adjusted. Now my loan has increase 400 a month. I just want them to rewrite my mortgage not to be adjustable anymore. After all this is what I asked for. I don’t need any money from them just them to step in a require them to be rewrote. I’m sure there are services I pay for with my tax dollars that you use that I really don’t care to pay for.
December 7th, 2007 at 6:57 am
How were you mislead? Were not the mortgage rate terms written on the documents you signed? Did you not read the documents before you signed them? I realize that the closing process is pretty fast-paced given all the papers shoved in front of buyers and sellers, and the excitement of purchasing a house can be overwhelming, but I do not see how someone can claim that they were defrauded without more information on how such criminal actions occurred. If these situations do arise, then there are courses of action to punish the perpetrators. Granted the litigation process is often long and unpleasant, but this current plan does not punish wrongdoers and does in many ways reward those who did make improper financial decisions through their own doing and not based on being “mislead.”